thumbnail

Anonymous

Posted on 2018-05-03 03:52:30 (Flag for deletion)

No,The bread book makes you a total faggot

Anonymous

Posted on 2023-07-05 12:52:28 (Flag for deletion)

fucking cringe. god awful book

Anonymous

Posted on 2023-07-18 21:52:36 (Flag for deletion)

holy based

Anonymous

Posted on 2023-11-28 22:45:05 (Flag for deletion)

the average anarkid is too morbidly fucking obese to pull off a remotely attractive femboy look lmao

thumbnail

ProletarianSkeleton

Posted on 2022-07-31 09:01:15 (Flag for deletion)

The truth pricks the eyes, fucking Nazis.

Anonymous

Posted on 2022-12-13 04:49:23 (Flag for deletion)

A very sad truth indeed.

Anonymous

Posted on 2023-11-12 00:45:39 (Flag for deletion)

Russia bad!!!!! russia bad russia bad because muh oligarchy or something (never mind the fact that the only so-called oligarchy that exists in russia is one that's hostile to Putin and the objectives of the special military operation)
rusia bad because vaush said so!!

Anonymous

Posted on 2023-11-27 13:27:30 (Flag for deletion)

Russia bad because it's a bourgeois dictatorship and actively opposes communism.

Anonymous

Posted on 2023-11-28 09:58:02 (Flag for deletion)

>Russia bad because it's a bourgeois dictatorship and actively opposes communism.
Did Schlaus Kwab and Seorge Goros tell you that one, or did you come to that conclusion through independent research and reading which we all know anarkids and Trotskyites partake in?

Anonymous

Posted on 2023-11-28 18:19:44 (Flag for deletion)

>"Russia actively opposes communism"
It literally doesn't and you haven't explained how Putin serves the interests of the bourgeoisie, but go ahead and keep spewing your Russophobic drivel disguised as "Marxist analysis" to push your completely twisted and impractical Trotskyist worldview.
Mein Gott, why are all Western "Marxists" like this?

Anonymous

Posted on 2023-11-28 22:43:39 (Flag for deletion)

>inb4 zyuganov “isn’t a real communist” because he doesn’t support trans people

thumbnail

Anonymous

Posted on 2021-04-18 19:47:32 (Flag for deletion)

>fetishizing work like it's still 1921

Reluctant_Uploader69

Posted on 2021-04-19 01:04:18 (Flag for deletion)

>Muh work fetish
Ok lazy-ass, I'd say read a book but that would be work!
Reduction of the work day is a reasonable goal of unions and socialist movements; Nonsense like "abolishing work" will make you look bad and it is utopian. It straight-out ignores the material conditions of production, especially the reliance of the material wealth of the western service economies on Third World labor. Wage labor isn't "work". Wage labor is a historical phenomenon. Nobody abandons the ideals of communism by working within the framework of what is materially possible - see Cockshott's schemes of organization of labor in socialism. You won't get your Star Trek replicators anytime soon unless you want to greatly reduce the living quality of everybody. If you're an able-bodied person doing nothing all day while living off the labour of others when you have fair and available work-options, you are being a leech.

Anonymous

Posted on 2021-07-20 13:45:34 (Flag for deletion)

mucho texto

Anonymous

Posted on 2023-02-01 18:07:27 (Flag for deletion)

Ok wagecuck


(0 hidden)

<<<25 26272829>>>